AI screening / high-volume hiring
800 APPLIED
6 ARE RIGHT
Sift interviews every single applicant within the hour, scores them against the scorecard your hiring manager actually signed off, and hands you a ranked shortlist with the evidence attached.
Applied to shortlisted, without a recruiter opening a CV
Sift sits in front of your ATS. Nothing changes for the hiring manager except the queue is already sorted when they open it.
Intake with the hiring manager
A fifteen minute conversation turns the job description into a weighted scorecard, with must-haves separated from nice-to-haves and each one made observable.
Interview every applicant
Structured, same questions, same order, by chat or voice, in the candidate's language. Follow-ups probe the claim, not the keyword.
Score against evidence
Every score cites the exact answer that produced it. No score exists without a quote a human can read and disagree with.
Shortlist and schedule
The top band goes to the hiring manager with transcripts. Everyone else gets a real answer the same day, not silence.
Every score points at the sentence that caused it
This is the whole product. A number nobody can trace is a number nobody will act on.
“On the tipper fleet I traced a slow-drift fault to a worn pilot valve after ruling out the pump, pressure held at idle but dropped under load, so it was internal leakage past the spool rather than supply.”
One logistics operator, four months, 11 requisitions
Warehouse, driver and field service roles. 6,400 applications.
The part that gets you past legal
Screening at volume is where discrimination claims come from. This is built for that room, not around it.
Same questions, everyone
Structured interviews only. No candidate gets an easier path because of how their CV was formatted or which school appears on it.
No score without a quote
Every rating is attached to the candidate's own words. If a decision is challenged, you can produce the evidence in minutes.
Adverse impact monitoring
Pass rates are tracked by protected characteristic and flagged when they diverge, so you find a problem before a tribunal does.
Give us your worst requisition
The one with four hundred applicants and nobody with time to read them. We'll screen it, shortlist it and show you the evidence behind every score.