AI denial management · revenue cycle

Two thirds of denials are never appealed. Not because they'd lose.

Because nobody had time. Appeal reads every remittance, works out the real reason behind the code, drafts the appeal with the payer's own policy cited, and files it inside the window.

Epic · Athenahealth · AdvancedMD · Waystar · Availity

Claim 8814-22 · deniedCO-197
PayerRegional PPO
ServiceMRI lumbar w/o contrast · 72148
Billed$2,410.00
Stated reasonPrecert absent
Appeal window18 days left
What Appeal found

Authorisation AUT-40711 was obtained on 14 March and is in the chart. It was filed against the ordering provider's NPI, not the rendering facility's, so the payer's system did not attach it. This is a matching failure, not a missing precert.

Letter drafted, policy section 4.2 cited, auth attachedReady to file
The problem

The code is rarely the reason

A denial code tells you which bucket the payer dropped the claim into. It almost never tells you what actually went wrong, which is why generic worklists produce appeals that lose.

CO-197

Precert absent

Usually present but filed against the wrong NPI, wrong date span, or under a superseded auth number.

CO-16

Missing information

The catch-all. Appeal reads the accompanying remark codes to find which of nineteen fields the payer actually wants.

CO-97

Bundled

Often correct. Sometimes a modifier was stripped in transmission. Appeal checks the original submission before arguing.

CO-50

Not medically necessary

Needs the clinical note, not a template. Appeal pulls the documentation that maps to the payer's own coverage criteria.

CO-29

Filed late

Frequently wrong. If there is a timely-filing acknowledgement in the clearinghouse record, that is the whole appeal.

PR-204

Not covered

Checks the member's plan document for the date of service, because coverage changes mid-year more often than anyone expects.

The flow

Denial to filed appeal

A biller reviews and signs every appeal. Appeal never transmits anything on its own.

01

Read the remittance

Parses the 835 including every remark code, not just the top-level CARC, and matches it back to what was actually submitted in the 837.

Automatic
02

Find the true cause

Compares the claim against the chart, the authorisation record and the clearinghouse acknowledgement to locate the discrepancy.

Evidence-led
03

Decide: appeal or correct

Some denials should be corrected and resubmitted, not appealed. Choosing wrong burns the window. Appeal picks the right path and says why.

Explained
04

Draft with the policy cited

Writes the letter against that payer's published coverage policy, quoting the section, and attaches the supporting documents automatically.

Cited
05

Track the window

Every appeal deadline is tracked per payer. Anything within five days of expiring goes to the top of the biller's queue.

Never missed
Figures

Two billing companies, nine months

Combined 41 provider groups, mostly imaging, orthopaedics and behavioural health.

3.1×
Denials actually appealed
+19pt
Overturn rate on appealed claims
$2.4M
Recovered that would have aged out
0
Appeals filed without a biller signing

Give us a month of denials you wrote off

Appeal works them blind and returns the ones it believes were winnable, with the drafted letter and the cited policy for each. You already know what they were worth.

Send a denial file